StaticMatic: New release + now on RubyForge

May 24th, 2007

Thanks to everyone who has contacted me about StaticMatic - seems it's not just me that finds it useful!

You can now find StaticMatic on RubyForge: http://rubyforge.org/projects/staticmatic/ where you can find the latest releases and access the code.

I've just released 0.1.0 which contains a small bug fix (thanks Chris!), improvements and additions to the helpers plus helper testing.

Enjoy!

Posted by stephen Filed in Code
del.icio.us | digg this

7 Responses to “StaticMatic: New release + now on RubyForge”

  1. clem Says:
    May 25th, 2007 at 12:54 AM

    Setup in Staticmatic 0.1.0 on windows xp creates the expected directories but they are empty. No starter files are created, at least on my system.

  2. Stephen Bartholomew Says:
    May 25th, 2007 at 08:46 AM

    clem: Staticmatic hasn't been tested on windows yet so thanks for letting me know about this issue.

    I'll get the bug fixed for the next release. For now, should still be able to create the files and build your site. There are 3 sample files created:

    src/pages/index.haml
src/layouts/application.haml
src/stylesheets/application.sass

    Apart from markup, the only code you need to have is a line in the appliaction.haml layout:

    = yield

    Let me know how you get on.

  3. Daniel B Says:
    May 26th, 2007 at 06:54 PM

    Sorry for posting twice, I didn't see that this page was here. StaticMatic looks great. Unfortunately though, I get $ staticmatic setup static_test /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/staticmatic-0.1.0/bin/../lib/staticmatic.rb:9: undefined method 'cattr_reader' for StaticMatic:Class (NoMethodError)

  4. Daniel B Says:
    May 26th, 2007 at 07:14 PM

    D'oh! I didn't have the activesupport gem installed. Now it seems to be fine. Can't wait to check it out.

  5. Stephen Bartholomew Says:
    May 27th, 2007 at 07:15 PM

    Daniel B: Glad you got it working and thanks for pointing out the activesupport dependency - I'll get that included in the next release!

  6. Ryan Mulligan Says:
    May 28th, 2007 at 08:02 PM

    Do we really need the ActiveSupport dependency? It only seems like you are using it for cattr_reader

Sorry, comments are closed for this article.